Wednesday, June 02, 2004
Slate: Bush brain-damaged
Here. Sometimes Slate seems to have the inside track on breaking news stories. On the other hand, they're often very openly anti-Bush. Is the site supposed to be based on the magazine model, or the unmoderated bulletin board model? Not that Bush criticism is necessarily bad -- but why in such a way? Throwing out unsubstantiated rumors/smears/implications shouldn't be Slate's thing.